Strategy & Leadership

From planning to execution

March 31, 2011

Global

March 31, 2011

Global
Our Editors

The Economist Intelligence Unit

_____________________

How executives at top utilities contribute to the success of capital projects

Report Summary

Every fiscal year, utility executives face difficult decisions about which capital projects to support and how to assess the benefits and risks of these investments to customers and stakeholders. Limited budgets, growing customer demand, renewable energy goals, risk of infrastructure failure and an ever-shifting regulatory environment are just a few of the factors they must consider as they balance their portfolios.

Making the wrong choice can lead to massive cost overruns, infrastructure failure and missed regulatory deadlines, all of which impact corporate viability and the bottom line. Additionally, it is the utility executives themselves who are held accountable for failed projects, even though their role becomes one of oversight once the initial decision-making process is completed.

The good news is that utility industry leaders have come to recognise the shortcomings in their portfolio management process, and many of them are making changes to improve results. This report investigates the methods they are using.

Our findings show that utility executives are increasingly:

  • demanding more rigorous up-front planning before a project will even be considered. If divisions want support for their initiatives, they must produce detailed project plans outlining benefits, risks, budgets, schedule and scope. This streamlines decision-making and eliminates bad ideas from the start;
  • managing budgets and risks across the portfolio, rather than considering projects individually. This approach gives them the flexibility to accommodate unexpected risks and take advantage of opportunities by moving funds between projects;
  • adding early milestone reviews to trigger the full release of funds. As project plans are often written months in advance of execution, this step ensures scope and budgets are still relevant before they make a final investment;
  • triggering immediate executive reviews when projects run significantly over budget or behind schedule. Having formal triggers enables executives to solve problems before projects veer off course;
  • viewing regulators as partners, not adversaries. Regulations are not going away, and the most timely and cost-effective way to address them is to work in conjunction with the regulators and elected officials.

Enjoy in-depth insights and expert analysis - subscribe to our Perspectives newsletter, delivered every week