Financial Services

The Future of Infrastructure Finance in MEASA

November 28, 2017

Middle East

November 28, 2017

Middle East
Melanie Noronha

Principal, Policy & insights

Melanie is a principal at Economist Impact. She has over ten years of experience delivering consulting and thought leadership projects to public, private and not-for-profit organisations. Based in Dubai, she leads the Middle East and Africa team on research across a range of sectors including food sustainability, recycling, renewable energy, fintech, trade and supply chains. She is a specialist in advanced recycling technologies and international trade. She is a seasoned moderator, having chaired numerous panel discussions and presented Economist Impact's research at global in-person and virtual conferences.

Before joining The Economist Group, she was a senior analyst at MEED Insight, a research and consulting firm serving Middle East and North Africa. At MEED, she developed expertise in bespoke market studies and financial modelling across a range of sectors spanning construction, finance, power and water, oil and gas, and renewable energy. She held previous posts at the Office of the Chief Economist at the Dubai International Financial Centre and at the San Francisco Center for Economic Development. Melanie has an MSc in International Strategy and Economics from the University of St Andrews and a bachelor’s degree in business administration.

Contact

Infrastructure brings economic and social value to a country: it can drive economic growth by facilitating business activity; it can provide residents with essential services, from mobility to electricity; and new projects can create new jobs.

 However, particularly in emerging economies, there is a chronic shortage of necessary investment to build transport, communications, energy and water infrastructure. In the Middle East, Africa and South Asia (MEASA) region, the funding deficit amounts to over US$500bn annually.

Domestic sources of capital—the mainstay of infrastructure development in emerging markets—fall short, owing to fiscal pressures from the chronic deficits run by many countries in the MEASA region, or because of the risk of overindebtedness arising from excessive borrowing. Similarly, funding from multilateral development banks (such as the World Bank), regional development banks (such as the Africa Development Bank and India’s Infrastructure Development Finance Company) and country donor partners (notably China) cannot hope to close the investment gap completely. Fresh sources of funding and new funding mechanisms will be essential if governments are to make progress in addressing their countries’ infrastructure needs by building roads, connecting populations to power, and providing clean drinking water and sanitation.

In the MEASA region, when infrastructure is not paid for directly by governments themselves, it is primarily financed by banks, rather than through capital markets or public-private partnerships (PPPs). “But we think that those conditions are changing and that the region will be less reliant on bank financing for infrastructure in the future,” says Michael Grifferty, president of the Gulf Bond and Sukuk Association. He cites several reasons for this. Among them is the mismatch of timelines between infrastructure projects and banks: banks prefer shorter-term debt to meet short-term obligations. In addition to this, regulatory changes such as concentration limits and those stemming from Basel III, such as increasing minimum capital-adequacy ratios, may constrain growth in banks’ balance sheets. “Enforcement of banking regulation will inadvertently result in pushing some financing towards capital markets,” says Mr Grifferty. Such shifts will create an opportunity for greater use of PPPs, capital markets, and alternative sources of finance such as pension funds and insurance companies that value predictable long-term income.

 

Download Article PDF

Enjoy in-depth insights and expert analysis - subscribe to our Perspectives newsletter, delivered every week